I like that Chan connects the stories of Gods judgment in ignoring the sacred to the New Testament, but it feels heavy handed. God did those things to make a point. let’s be honest,
We do not understand what “sacred” means.
We do rush into things we don’t understand.
“THE sacred” typifies pretty much We also don’t have to stop at the sentence that you wrote, Francis. It is a great idea, but it’s not the actual words of God, and it’s not even the biggest mystery I’ve contemplated today. That sounds a little cavalier, but the thing I dislike about Francis is that he kind of shames you because your not as blown away by his idea as he is.
The repetition of the heaven being where God dwelt feels a little overstated after Jesus. I mean, is the temple that impressive in light of God incarnate? It doesn’t feel like it.
Chan nails “A small part of an eternal plan”. The church is the sacredness. The body of Christ on earth, his people, his priests. That is the real sacredness, but it’s not unapproachable. It’s us, it’s the one another’s.
Comments
Post a Comment